Tuesday, June 27, 2006

Secretary of Treasury Admonishes Keller

Like Helen, Mr Keller of the New York Times seems blind and deaf to rational arguments, vigorously presented, over a period of months, AGAINST the illegal publication of classified programs, Terrorist Finance a particular program among many.

Unlike Helen, Mr Keller exhibits an astonishing insulation to ration, reason, national security, self-preservation or even newsworthiness in general.

US Secretary of the Treasury, Mr Snow, addresses these issues as well as Mr Kellers dissembling remarks in this open letter from Mr Snow TO Mr Keller:

What Constitutes Treason Today?

Pictured: Mr Keller on a good day.

Me? I personally favor the idea of a Class-Action suit on behalf of the Americans materially endangered by this irresponsible, arrogant and America-hating person; coupled with Federal agents seizing their offices, the Times Building, its presses and computers while a Federal case for the Times' complicity in acts that 'aid and comfort' America's enemies is being prosecuted, after which they can have it all back, IF there IS a New York Times then!

When I signed my copy of the Official Secrets Act : Contract with the US Government, in order to be cleared for Top Secret info for which I might have a Need To Know, I promised to KEEP THOSE SECRETS, and have to this day! Why should the NYTimes (or Sandy Berger or anyone else) be immune to or above the laws of our nation?


Mr. Bill Keller, Managing Editor
The New York Times
229 West 43rd Street
New York, NY 10036

Dear Mr. Keller:

The New York Times’ decision to disclose the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program, a robust and classified effort to map terrorist networks through the use of financial data, was irresponsible and harmful to the security of Americans and freedom-loving people worldwide. In choosing to expose this program, despite repeated pleas from high-level officials on both sides of the aisle, including myself, the Times undermined a highly successful counter-terrorism program and alerted terrorists to the methods and sources used to track their money trails.

Your charge that our efforts to convince The New York Times not to publish were “half-hearted” is incorrect and offensive. Nothing could be further from the truth. Over the past two months, Treasury has engaged in a vigorous dialogue with the Times - from the reporters writing the story to the D.C. Bureau Chief and all the way up to you. It should also be noted that the co-chairmen of the bipartisan 9-11 Commission, Governor Tom Kean and Congressman Lee Hamilton, met in person or placed calls to the very highest levels of the Times urging the paper not to publish the story. Members of Congress, senior U.S. Government officials and well-respected legal authorities from both sides of the aisle also asked the paper not to publish or supported the legality and validity of the program.

Indeed, I invited you to my office for the explicit purpose of talking you out of publishing this story. And there was nothing “half-hearted” about that effort. I told you about the true value of the program in defeating terrorism and sought to impress upon you the harm that would occur from its disclosure. I stressed that the program is grounded on solid legal footing, had many built-in safeguards, and has been extremely valuable in the war against terror. Additionally, Treasury Under Secretary Stuart Levey met with the reporters and your senior editors to answer countless questions, laying out the legal framework and diligently outlining the multiple safeguards and protections that are in place.

You have defended your decision to compromise this program by asserting that “terror financiers know” our methods for tracking their funds and have already moved to other methods to send money. The fact that your editors believe themselves to be qualified to assess how terrorists are moving money betrays a breathtaking arrogance and a deep misunderstanding of this program and how it works. While terrorists are relying more heavily than before on cumbersome methods to move money, such as cash couriers, we have continued to see them using the formal financial system, which has made this particular program incredibly valuable.

Lastly, justifying this disclosure by citing the “public interest” in knowing information about this program means the paper has given itself free license to expose any covert activity that it happens to learn of - even those that are legally grounded, responsibly administered, independently overseen, and highly effective. Indeed, you have done so here.

What you’ve seemed to overlook is that it is also a matter of public interest that we use all means available - lawfully and responsibly - to help protect the American people from the deadly threats of terrorists. I am deeply disappointed in the New York Times.



John W. Snow, Secretary

U.S. Department of the Treasury


Anonymous Pinch O'Saltyburger said...

hasn't anyone at the NYT read the Al Qaeda Manual?
it speaks of gathering intelligence from such legal and readily available sources as common newspapers.
all intelligence is valued to the terrorists.
maybe the NYT was just trying to expand their readership, ha ha

Tuesday, June 27, 2006 10:10:00 AM  
Blogger Karridine said...

Saltyburger, you're right that the al-Q War Manual advises jihadis and mujaheddin to gather intelligence from open, legal sources, but truth is, THAT'S A LOT like WORK!

If jihadis wanted to WORK FOR A LIVING, well sheesh! they could just be k'ffir dhimmis, couldn't they? K'ffir and dhimmis do the work, Muslims accept the jezya (tribute, tithe to MUSLIMS)!

Wednesday, June 28, 2006 6:32:00 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home