"Rape Is Fine! Not the Man's Fault!"
Self-proclaimed 'sheik' Hilaly, in Australia, STILL says its just fine, peachy-dandy to rape, and when a woman (or a man) IS raped, do NOT blame it on the cat-like, animalistic men!
Karridine
Graphic: Hilaly: Rape-rationalizing loser, bereft of Baha'u'llah.
Ask The Aussie Imam
Islamic Advice from Imam Yahu al-Zirius
Spiritual Leader, Fostaz al-Vegimita Mosque
Lakembabongabinga, Sydney, NSW
Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali of Mullagangabanga, NSW asks:
Some of the cobbers at my local mosque spotted some sheilas who weren’t wearing their hijabs, so they naturally had a go at raping them. For some reason the coppers loaded them off to gaol! I ask you: if you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it ... whose fault is it, the cats or the uncovered meat?
This is a very interesting question. With respect to cats, the Q’ran in Surah 12:45.1(c) states that, “the cat always lands on its paws.” However, Surah 3.14e-9 says that “pita bread always lands hummus-side down.”
Of course, the crafty infidel will see this as a contradiction: what if a believer were to glue a hummus-laden pita to the back of a cat, and hurl it from the local prayer tower? No matter how it hits the ground, the crafty infidel will say it invalidates Q’ranic infallibility! This is where the meat comes in. The key is to first put the uncovered meat between the cat and the pita, in a sort of cat-meat-pita sandwich. As it plummets from the tower, the cat will eat through the glue to get at the delicious uncovered meat, thereby freeing the pita to land hummus side down, and the meat-refreshed cat to land happily on its paws. In this way you may demonstrate to the crafty kuffar the eternal perfection of the sacred Word of Allah, as revealed through His Prophet (peace be unto him). Also, if the crafty kuffar is an uncovered woman, don’t forget to rape her.
Imram M. of Jumbuck Springs, Victoria asks:
I am a taxi driver at the Melbourne Airport. The Taxi Directorate tells me I must give rides to blind kuffars and their filthy guide dogs, even when I tell him they are haram in the eyes of Allah! Even worse, I think the kuffars and their dogs have been drinking alcohol. Help me, I am at my wit’s end.
Sadly the dog-alcohol cootie issue has been a sore point for the many believers who work at the airport. We have long asked the Airport authority to exempt Muslim baggage handlers from touching luggage containing alcohol, and protect Muslim passengers from having contact with unclean bomb-sniffing dogs. Until we can correct this blatant discrimination, politely tell any fares who are potentially carrying alcohol or dogs that you will rape them.
Ameer Ali of Kangalangaroombawoomba, ACT writes:
As a member of Prime Minister Howard’s Muslim advisory board, I have occasion to travel. When I go abroad, they ask me where do I come from? I say I come from a Muslim country. “Which country,” they say. “
When I come back to
Of course
2 Comments:
You have not attributed Iowahawk's piece properly. At no point do you mention that the 'Ask The Aussie Imam' piece was written by him, nor provide any indicators in the text (quotation marks, use of 'blockquote' function etc) to suggest that you're reproducing the work of someone else.
The "hat tip" at the bottom only signifies that Iowahawk referred the actual story of al-Hilaly to you. The fact that you don't provide a link to Iowahawk's blog and the entry "Ask The Aussie Imam" in your hat tip is an unfortunate oversight.
As this blog entry stands, a reader unfamiliar with Iowahawk's work would assume that you wrote the piece "Ask The Aussie Imam". I think attributing this parody to Iowahawk via an explicit reference would be the right thing to do.
You know, a 'reader unfamiliar with Iowahawk's work' really might assume that I wrote that piece, although that is not the intent here, to pass off the work of others as my own.
And if this were not a light-hearted, carefree and -might I say- gay weblog of satire, parody and sometimes rational observation of a square-critical nature, I would agree unreservedly with your comments, which I thank you for sharing.
Post a Comment
<< Home